Archbishop Edgar Pena Parra, the sostituto or deputy secretary of state, has admitted that he authorized electronic surveillance of the director of the Vatican bank, without legal authorization.
“I did it, and if necessary I would do it again,” the archbishop told a Vatican tribunal, in revealing testimony in the landmark financial-misconduct case.
Archbishop Pena Parra—who is not a defendant in the case—said that he ordered the surveillance because he wanted information about the “anomalous attitude” of directors of the Institute for Religious Works (IOR), who had refused an application from the Secretariat of State for a loan to support a controversial London real-estate deal.
Archbishop Pena Parra also allowed that he “maybe” asked a subordinate to arrange for a wiretap on the phone of Gianfranco Mammi, who was then director of the IOR.
Because the surveillance took place both inside Vatican City and on Italian territory, the archbishop could be exposed to prosecution in both jurisdictions for illegal electronic surveillance.
Like his predecessor, Cardinal Angelo Becciu, who is the leading defendant in the current trial, Archbishop Pena Parra has exercised enormous influence. The office of sostituto makes him in effect the Vatican’s chief of staff, responsible for the day-to-day administration of Vatican affairs. His decision to order surveillance without seeking any legal approval—together with his testimony that he would do it again—highlights the fundamental problem at issue in the Vatican financial trial: the willingness of senior Vatican officials, particularly in the Secretariat of State, to make decisions they are not authorized to make, for which they are (ordinarily) not held accountable.
READ ON BELOW…
Archbishop admits spying on other Vatican officials [News analysis] | News Headlines | Catholic Culture
